Skip to main content
· 4/13/1987

Soden v. State

Citations

  • 523 A.2d 1015
  • 71 Md. App. 1
  • 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Although no direct evidence of dates of commission of offenses was presented, evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant could only have committed crimes following his release from prison, thus during his probationary period
  • Although no direct evidence of dates of commission of offenses was presented, evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant could only have committed crimes following his release from prison, thus during his probationary period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wilner, Garrity, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.