Soda v. Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the exclusion of evidence is not grounds for the granting of a new trial if evidence of the same facts were introduced by the party applying for a new trial
• “As a general rule, questions concerning the admission or exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the trial court, and may be reversed on appeal only when a clear abuse of discretion is apparent.”
• Questions concerning the admission or exclusion of evidence are within the sound discretion of the trial court and may be reversed on appeal only when a clear abuse of discretion is present
• no basis for reversal and new trial if excluded evidence cumulative in nature
• “The exclusion of evidence is not grounds for the granting of a new trial if evidence of the same fact or facts was introduced by the party applying for a new trial. There is no basis for a reversal, and a new trial, if the excluded evidence was cumulative in nature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).