Skip to main content
· 9/23/1987

Sobel v. Wingard

Citations

  • 531 A.2d 520
  • 366 Pa. Super. 482
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating Pennsylvania does not recognize a cause of action in tort for harassment
  • Pennsylvania law recognizes an absolute privilege in connection with communications concerning employment termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Tamilia, Watkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.