Snyders v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating with regard to stipulations that “[i]n all cases of doubt, that construction should be adopted which is favorable to the party in whose favor [the stipulation] is made” (emphasis, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)
• stating with regard to stipulations that “[i]n all cases of doubt, that construction should be adopted which is favorable to the party in whose favor [the stipulation] is made” (emphasis, internal quotation marks, and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lack
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-07-06· cited 53×
• State v. Padilla
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-06-08· cited 14×
• State ex rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Laura J.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-04-08· cited 10×
• Segura v. K-Mart Corp.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-06-28· cited 5×
• Pedroza v. Lomas Auto Mall, Inc.
  D. New Mexico· 2010-04-30· cited 4×
• State ex rel. CYFD v. Laura J.
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-09-26

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Brandt's Estate
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1948-03-01· cited 26×
• Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1952-06-17· cited 21×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-02· cited 16×
• Prince Georges Properties, Inc. v. Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-29· cited 11×
• State Tax Commission v. Murray Co. of Texas, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-03-30· cited 10×
• State Tax Commission v. Murray Co. of Texas, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1960-12-30· cited 6×
• D. Latchis, Inc. v. Borofsky Bros., Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-07-31· cited 4×
• People v. Marsicano
  California Court of Appeal· 1943-03-09· cited 3×