Skip to main content
· 4/18/1967

Snyder v. Udall

Citations

  • 267 F. Supp. 110
  • 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting motion to compel and not imposing cost-shifting 7 measures after modifying subpoena
  • finding sanctions inappropriate when Defendant sought relevant documents, offered to limit the scope of the requests, and the third party failed to meet its burden to show undue burden other than some requests being facially overbroad
  • “When a subpoena is issued as a discovery device, relevance for purposes of the undue burden test is measured according to the standard of [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 26(b)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.