Snyder v. Steele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding \the term 'common nuisance' as used in the statute requires proof of a continuous or recurrent violation\
• “[W]e can infer beyond a reasonable doubt that based upon the strong smell of burnt marijuana Zuniga Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 42A01-1505-CR-463 | April 4, 2016 Page 6 of 9 knew that the residence was used for the unlawful use of a controlled substance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).