Supreme Court of Iowa· 8/25/1982
Snyder v. Davenport
Citations
- 323 N.W.2d 225
- 1982 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1450
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the case squarely within the statutory scheme, and holding that a suit against a liquor licensee for selling liquor to an intoxicated person may be brought only by following the dramshop act
- dramshop act usurps a common law negligence action against a licensee grounded on the sale of intoxicants to an intoxicated person in violation of section 123.49(1)
- dramshop act usurps a common law negligence action against a licensee grounded on the sale of intoxicants to an intoxicated person in violation of section 123.-49(1)
- \To adopt a common-law cause of action irrespective of [section 123.92] would be ill-advised and would render the statutory scheme inoperative.\
- “To adopt a common-law cause of action irrespective of [section 123.92] would be ill-advised and would render the statutory scheme inoperative.”
- “a suit against a liquor licensee for selling liquor to an intoxicated person may be brought only by following the statutory scheme” when case falls squarely within the scheme
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schultz, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont· 1986-01-24· cited 115×
- Kelly v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1991-10-16· cited 70×
- Slager v. HWA Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1989-01-25· cited 68×
- Van Baale v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-06-19· cited 57×
- Haafke v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-04-11· cited 47×
- Knight v. RowerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1999-10-29· cited 43×
- Clark v. MincksSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-03-20· cited 42×
- Grovijohn v. Virjon, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-02-27· cited 30×
- Thorp v. Casey's General Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1989-10-17· cited 30×
- Fuhrman v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1987-01-14· cited 28×
- Connolly v. ConlanSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-07-31· cited 27×
- Horak v. Argosy Gaming Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2002-07-17· cited 24×
- Nelson v. Restaurants of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1983-10-19· cited 21×
- Winney v. Ransom & Hastings, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-15· cited 20×
- Emily M. Bass, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-06-10· cited 18×
- Golden v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Iowa· 1985-04-17· cited 15×
- Bauer v. DannSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-08-19· cited 15×
- Eddy v. Casey's General Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-05-13· cited 14×
- Summerhays v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-01-21· cited 8×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-06-29· cited 121×
- Trail v. ChristianSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-12-07· cited 78×
- Cowman v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa· 1958-10-14· cited 61×
- Seeman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-07-21· cited 57×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 50×
- Williams v. KlemesrudSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-05-11· cited 35×
- Fitzer v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1977-04-29· cited 33×
- State v. WhetstineSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-02-17· cited 28×
- State v. One Certain Conveyance, 1971 Honda 350 Motorcycle, Red & White in Color, Iowa 1972 License 26-71 VIN SL-350-2015068Supreme Court of Iowa· 1973-10-17· cited 28×
- Robinson v. LamottSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-13· cited 25×
- Robinson v. BognannoSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-12-19· cited 19×
- Goebel v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-06-28· cited 19×
- Cole v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa· 1862-12-22· cited 18×
- Lease v. VanceSupreme Court of Iowa· 1870-04-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.