Skip to main content
· 1/28/1987

Snow v. Western Savings & Loan Ass'n

Citations

  • 730 P.2d 204
  • 152 Ariz. 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant properly may interfere intentionally with another’s contract by appropriate means to protect an interest of the defendant
  • “[a] determination of good faith involves an inquiry into the party’s motive and purpose as well as actual intent”
  • conduct was intentional where interferer 27 intended result or knew it was “substantially certain to be produced” by his conduct
  • Whether defendant acted improperly is determined by “weighing the social importance of the interest the defendant seeks to advance against the interest invaded.”
  • “The tort is intentional in the sense that [the defendant] must have intended to interfere with the [plaintiffs] contract or have known that this result was substantially certain to be produced by its conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.