Snow v. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar do not fall within the meaning of a rule under the FWA
• stating that the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar do not fall within the meaning of a rule under the FWA
• explaining that “the duty of good faith performance does not exist until a plaintiff can establish a term of the contract the other party was obligated to perform and did n'ot”
• rejecting plaintiffs claim because her complaint failed to link the implied covenant of good faith to a breach of an express provision of her contract with defendant
• “There can be no cause of action for a breach of the implied covenant absent an allegation that an express term of the contract has been breached.”
• “[I]t is axiomatic that in construing a statute courts must first look at the actual language used in the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).