Skip to main content
· 5/20/1991

Snohomish County v. Hinds

Citations

  • 810 P.2d 84
  • 61 Wash. App. 371
  • 1991 Wash. App. LEXIS 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that isolated comments by individual board members do not invalidate a board’s factual findings so long as those findings are supported by substantial evidence
  • Board decision rejecting a proposed annexation which would have added an odd \inverted T\ to the south end of Everett
  • Board decision rejecting a proposed annexation which would have added an odd \inverted T\ to the south end of Everett
  • trial court overturning boundary review board
  • trial court overturning boundary review board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forrest

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.