Snively Adoption

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the emerging trend seems in favor of disallowing pre-service removal”
• ordering remand where the out- of-state defendant removed the case only six days after plaintiffs filed the complaint and before any defendant was served
• collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
• collecting cases, holding pre service removal is inconsistent with fundamental purposes of 21 removal and forum defendant rule and violates that rule, disagreeing with district court decisions permitting removal
• \Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [ ] of forum shopping by a defendant.\
• “Pre-service removal by means of monitoring the electronic docket smacks [] of forum shopping by a defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).