Skip to main content
· 4/22/1999

Snipes v. State

Citations

  • 733 So. 2d 1000
  • 1999 WL 247242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a typographical error of the victim’s name in the information did not result in a fatal variance
  • “A decision on a motion for a mistrial is within the discretion of the trial judge and such a motion should be granted only in the case of absolute necessity.”
  • “A decision on a motion for mistrial is within the discretion of the trial 12 Discussions at a later bench conference revealed the prosecutor’s erroneous belief that Giardina had three prior convictions. (Doc. 11 Ex. 2 at 176-77

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.