Snipes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “a hearing examiner must necessarily take into account what came before in determining whether a „change‟ has occurred”
• consideration of the prior determination is necessarily taken into account in deciding whether, for modification purposes, a change has occurred
• consideration of the prior determination is necessarily taken into account in deciding whether, for modification purposes, a change has occurred
• “[A] claimant’s right to an evidentiary hearing . . . is triggered only where there is reason to believe that a change of conditions has occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).