Snipes v. City of Bakersfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where compliance with the [CGCA] is required, the plaintiff must allege compliance or circumstances excusing compliance, or the complaint is subject to general demurrer.”
• “Where compliance with the 13 [CGCA] is required, the plaintiff must allege compliance or circumstances excusing compliance, 14 or the complaint is subject to general demurrer.”
• “Where compliance with the [CGCA] is 24 required, the plaintiff must allege compliance or circumstances excusing compliance, or the 25 complaint is subject to general demurrer.”
• “Where compliance with the [CGCA] is required, the plaintiff 23 must allege compliance or circumstances excusing compliance, or the complaint is subject to 24 general demurrer.”
• “Where compliance with 6 the [CGCA] is required, the plaintiff must allege compliance or circumstances excusing 7 compliance, or the complaint is subject to general demurrer.”
• “actions seeking redress for employment discrimination 11 pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act . . . are not subject to the claim- 12 presentation requirements of the Tort Claims Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).