Skip to main content
· 11/8/2011

Snider v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission

Citations

  • 356 S.W.3d 320
  • 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1475
  • 2011 WL 5335414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “evidence that [the employee] violated several [agency] policies” supports a finding that dismissal was for the good of the service
  • discipline more severe than that imposed upon other employees who had violated policy was for the good of the service
  • “concerns about other employees’ ability to successfully work as a team with” the offending employee is a proper consideration in determination that dismissal was not for the good of the service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pfeiffer, Howard, Welsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.