· 11/8/2011
Snider v. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission
Citations
- 356 S.W.3d 320
- 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1475
- 2011 WL 5335414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “evidence that [the employee] violated several [agency] policies” supports a finding that dismissal was for the good of the service
- discipline more severe than that imposed upon other employees who had violated policy was for the good of the service
- “concerns about other employees’ ability to successfully work as a team with” the offending employee is a proper consideration in determination that dismissal was not for the good of the service
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pfeiffer, Howard, Welsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.