Snider-Carpenter v. City of Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “complex scheme” to defraud victims of nearly $2 million was particularly serious
• recognizing that to reverse the agency’s factual findings when reviewing for substantial evidence, the record must compel a contrary conclusion
• concluding that there was no abuse of discretion when the IJ considered the Frentescu factors in making the particularly serious crime determination
• concluding that a complex scheme to defraud victims of nearly $2 million that resulted in a sentence of 16 months of imprisonment and a restitution order of $650,000 was particularly serious
• holding that neither, the IJ nor BIA abused discretion in particularly serious crime determination where they reviewed the conviction itself, the guilty plea’s Statement of Facts, the sentence, the restitution order, and the petitioner’s lack of remorse
• applying abuse USCA11 Case: 21-10271 Date Filed: 08/09/2022 Page: 23 of 26 23 Opinion of the Court 21-10271 of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).