Skip to main content
· 5/18/2001

Sneyd v. International Paper Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 142 F. Supp. 2d 819
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6715
  • 2001 WL 563931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “no legal authority for the proposition that a corporation has a duty to disclose to potential employees that it is contemplating the sale of, or has decided to sell, a subsidiary corporation”
  • “Because all parties acquiesce in the application of the substantive law of Michigan, the Court will apply Michigan law and need not conduct a choice-of-law analysis sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gadola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.