· 3/29/1963
Snelling & Snelling of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Wall
Citations
- 189 N.E.2d 231
- 345 Mass. 634
- 1963 Mass. LEXIS 720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that when “damages are sought they must be proved” within the wider principle that the complaining party must establish his claim
- claim for lost profits resulting from defendant’s violation of “no competition” agreement too speculative, absent (i) proof that fees collected in violation of agreement would otherwise have gone to plaintiff and (ii
- claim for lost profits resulting from defendant’s violation of “no competition” agreement too speculative, absent (i) proof that fees collected in violation of agreement would otherwise have gone to plaintiff and (ii) proof of amount of profit which would have been realized from fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cutter, Kiek, Kirk, Reardon, Spalding, Wilkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.