Skip to main content
· 3/29/1963

Snelling & Snelling of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Wall

Citations

  • 189 N.E.2d 231
  • 345 Mass. 634
  • 1963 Mass. LEXIS 720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that when “damages are sought they must be proved” within the wider principle that the complaining party must establish his claim
  • claim for lost profits resulting from defendant’s violation of “no competition” agreement too speculative, absent (i) proof that fees collected in violation of agreement would otherwise have gone to plaintiff and (ii
  • claim for lost profits resulting from defendant’s violation of “no competition” agreement too speculative, absent (i) proof that fees collected in violation of agreement would otherwise have gone to plaintiff and (ii) proof of amount of profit which would have been realized from fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cutter, Kiek, Kirk, Reardon, Spalding, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.