Snell v. Village of University Park

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• witnesses who observed fall testified it did not appear plaintiff came into contact with allegedly defective object
• appellate court affirmed granting of summary judgment where plaintiff’s evidence failed to support an inference of probability, rather than possibility
• jury verdict for plaintiff reversed on appeal because plaintiffs theory she was thrown from bicycle when it came into contact with an allegedly defective curb was unsupported. No evidence had been introduced to show plaintiffs bicycle had come into contact with curb
• jury verdict for plaintiff reversed on appeal because plaintiff's theory she was thrown from bicycle when it came into contact with an allegedly defective curb was unsupported. No evidence had been introduced to show plaintiff's bicycle had come into contact with curb

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).