Skip to main content
· 11/18/1878

Snell v. Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 98 U.S. 85
  • 25 L. Ed. 52
  • 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the common law standard of clear and convincing evidence necessary to reform a contract
  • “[A] mere mistake of law, stripped of all other circumstances, constitutes no ground for the reformation of written contracts.”
  • insurance contract applied to only a portion of the cotton for which coverage was sought when the contract mistakenly covered only an individual's interest in the cotton, rather than that of the entire company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.