· 11/18/1878
Snell v. Insurance Co.
Citations
- 98 U.S. 85
- 25 L. Ed. 52
- 1878 U.S. LEXIS 1366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the common law standard of clear and convincing evidence necessary to reform a contract
- “[A] mere mistake of law, stripped of all other circumstances, constitutes no ground for the reformation of written contracts.”
- insurance contract applied to only a portion of the cotton for which coverage was sought when the contract mistakenly covered only an individual's interest in the cotton, rather than that of the entire company
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.