Snell v. CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a speech restriction in the form of an ad hoc oral directive by a police officer, without any guiding formal policy, presents a risk of arbitrary enforcement warranting heightened scrutiny
• holding that a speech restriction in the form of an ad hoc oral directive by a police officer, without any guiding formal policy, presents a risk of arbitrary enforcement warranting heightened scrutiny
• identifying factual issues regarding whether police officer’s restrictions against protester were narrowly tailored to meet government’s compelling interests
• identifying factual issues regarding whether police officer’s restrictions against pro- tester were narrowly tailored to meet government’s compel- ling interests
• rejecting “efforts to boot-strap excessive force claims and probable cause challenges”
• rejecting “efforts to boot- strap excessive force claims and probable cause challenges”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).