Snead v. Giles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a denial of a discretionary raise “can never constitute an actionable adverse employment action”
• ruling \these off-color comments were no more than stray remarks\ because plaintiff failed to establish the requisite causal connection in a retaliation claim
• affirming dismissal at summary judgment of Title VII claim where plaintiff failed to notify employer that his religious beliefs conflicted with his ability to work
• “[Plaintiff] complains that he was paid late, denied certain vacation requests, and forced to work overtime when his replacement did not show up. These troubles are no more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or alteration of job responsibilities.”
• denial of vacation requests did not constitute adverse employment action
• denial of vacation requests not adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).