Skip to main content
· 9/25/1996

Snavely v. Nordskog Electric Vehicles \Marketeer\

Citations

  • 947 F. Supp. 999
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18630
  • 1995 WL 905614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to grant motion to reconsider based on the possibility of securing deposition testimony sufficient to foreclose the suit’s dismissal because plaintiff offered no explanation for why he had failed to take the deposition before the dismissal occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wingate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.