Snapp v. Civil Service Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “scandalous” statements are those which “un- necessarily reflect[] on the moral character of an individual or state[] anything in repulsive language that detracts from the dignity of the court” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting 8 that, for the purposes of Rule 12(f), affidavits and declarations may also be considered 9 “pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).