Skip to main content
· 4/30/1992

Smyth v. USAA Property & Casualty Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 5 Cal. App. 4th 1470
  • 7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that definition of “business” in primary policy as “trade, profession, or occupation” did not create an ambiguity, though “business” was defined in the umbrella policy as “trade, occupation, profession or business”
  • “That this definition is not identical in the primary and excess policies does not create an ambiguity.”
  • “That this definition is not identical in the primary and excess policies does not create an ambiguity.”
  • interpretation of an insurance policy, like any other contract, is a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone (s.J.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.