Smyth v. Caswell
Citations
- 65 Tex. 379
- 1886 Tex. LEXIS 672
Syllabus
<p>1. Estates of decedents—Independent executor—Presentation of claim for allowance, before suit, not necessary—Pleading—It is not necessary, before suing an executor administering an estate independently of the county court, upon a claim against his testator, to present to him the claim for allowance, nor is it necessary, in such cases, to allege that the executor has assets out of which a judgment can be satisfied.</p> <p>2. Cases reviewed—Fulton v. Black (21 Tex. 425), and Walters v. Prestidge (30 Tex. 66), reviewed.</p> <p>3. Case approved—Pleasant v. Davidson (34 Tex., 459) cited and approved.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Tenn. Code Ann. § 56–2–504(b) “was not by its own terms, however, intended to be an exclusive means of service of process on a foreign insurance corporation”
- noting that Tenn. Code Ann. § 56–2–504(b) “was not by its own terms, however, intended to be an exclusive means of service of process on a foreign insurance corporation”
- noting that Tenn. Code Ann. § 56–2–504(b) “was not by its own terms, however, intended to be an exclusive means of service of process on a foreign insurance corporation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.