Skip to main content
· 2/8/1966

Smuda v. Smuda

Citations

  • 153 Conn. 430
  • 217 A.2d 59
  • 1966 Conn. LEXIS 543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wills act ‘‘is not only directory but also prohibitive and exhaustive’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Murphy, Alcorn, Shannon, House

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.