· 5/11/1984
Smuck v. United States
Citations
- 5 Cl. Ct. 94
- 1984 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “proceeding pro se is not a rare and exceptional 9 circumstance because it is typical of those bringing a § 2254 claim.”
- ruling that applicable term “‘accident’ refers to the cause of injury rather than the injury itself”
- finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
- finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
- finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
- finding that the district court properly did not consider inadmissible hearsay in an affidavit filed with motion for summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.