Smock v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “statutorily-prescribed forfeiture is constitutional when supported by the preponderance of the evidence”
• concluding that “statutorily-prescribed forfeiture is constitutional when supported by the preponderance of the evidence”
• concluding that “statutorily-prescribed forfeiture is constitutional when supported by the preponderance of the evidence”
• observing that defendants “were involved with the Mexican Mafia, an extraordinarily violent organized crime en terprise,” and that “there were hundreds of Mexican Mafia members and associates still at large”
• describing a host of murders and attempted murders by a handful of Mexican Mafia members
• describing a host of murders and attempted murders by a handful of Mexican Mafia members

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).