· 5/17/1990
Smock v. Hale
Citations
- 555 N.E.2d 74
- 197 Ill. App. 3d 732
- 144 Ill. Dec. 177
- 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 695
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- change in circumstances warranted revision of discovery schedule, making summary judgment inappropriate when plaintiff had not abused the discovery process
- change in circumstances warranted revision of discovery schedule, making summary judgment inappropriate when plaintiff had not abused the discovery process
- a doctor who was an expert in Crohn’s disease was qualified to testify against a family practitioner who supervised the pregnancy of a patient with Crohn’s disease
- a doctor who was an expert in Crohn's disease was qualified to testify against a family practitioner who supervised the pregnancy of a patient with Crohn's disease
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Knecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.