Skip to main content
· 5/17/1990

Smock v. Hale

Citations

  • 555 N.E.2d 74
  • 197 Ill. App. 3d 732
  • 144 Ill. Dec. 177
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • change in circumstances warranted revision of discovery schedule, making summary judgment inappropriate when plaintiff had not abused the discovery process
  • change in circumstances warranted revision of discovery schedule, making summary judgment inappropriate when plaintiff had not abused the discovery process
  • a doctor who was an expert in Crohn’s disease was qualified to testify against a family practitioner who supervised the pregnancy of a patient with Crohn’s disease
  • a doctor who was an expert in Crohn's disease was qualified to testify against a family practitioner who supervised the pregnancy of a patient with Crohn's disease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knecht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.