Skip to main content
· 4/23/1984

Smoak Ex Rel. Estate of Hudson v. Liebherr-America, Inc.

Citations

  • 315 S.E.2d 116
  • 281 S.C. 420
  • 1984 S.C. LEXIS 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding denial of post-trial motion, and affirming general verdict under “two issue” rule with court noting that “the record indicates the trial judge asked the respective attorneys for assistance in constructing a special verdict form to submit to the jury, but received none”
  • where expert’s opinion rests on sufficient factual foundation, it is within the province of the jury to determine its probative value
  • where case was presented to jury on negligence and breach of warranty causes of action, appellate court need not address breach of warranty exceptions if it finds that verdict was supported by the evidence under the theory of negligence
  • where case was presented to jury on negligence and breach of warranty causes of action, appellate court need not address breach of warranty exceptions if it finds that verdict was supported by the evidence under the theory of negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Littlejohn, Gregory, Harwell, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.