Smo v. Black

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• purpose of ORCP 46 C is to provide “reimbursements for the expenses necessitated by an unreasonable refusal to admit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gottenberg v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-03· cited 8×
• Elliott v. Progressive Halcyon Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-10-08· cited 8×
• Adams v. Hunter Engineering Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-02-16· cited 6×
• Smo v. Swall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-08
• Arnold v. McClanahan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-06-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smo v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-05· cited 6×
• Becker v. DeLeone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-04-16· cited 4×

Other cases named Smo v. Black

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Smo v. Black
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-05· cited 6×