Smithwick v. Crutchfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the fact that proceeding before second judge was denominated a trial did not change its essential nature of constituting a “rehearing of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment” because the same legal question was decided in both
• “[O]rdinarily one judge may not modify, overrule, or change the judgment of another Superior Court judge previously made in the same action.” (quoting Calloway v. Ford Motor Co., 281 N.C. 496, 501, 189 S.E.2d 484, 488 (1972))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).