Smith's Administrator v. Louisville Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs pleaded sufficient facts to state a plausible claim that the city’s policy and practice of jailing them for their inability to pay fines violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses
• granting defendant’s motion to strike only as to mistaken references to the First and Eighth Amendments and otherwise denying the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).