Smithley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to quash a claimant’s brief for failure to comply with the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure “because she is proceeding pro se and we are able to discern the legal arguments raised”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).