Skip to main content
· 12/1/1992

Smitherman v. City of New York

Citations

  • 188 A.D.2d 276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • amending to add the following paragraph: “We have reviewed the contentions raised in [Plaintiff’s] pro se supplement brief and pro se addendum and conclude that none warrant reversal or modification of the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.