Skip to main content
· 5/15/1878

Smithee v. Garth

Citations

  • 33 Ark. 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract awardee lacks standing to bring a bid protest in connection to its own contract unless the contract awardee challenges corrective action on the same contract
  • noting that disputes between a current contractor and the government that are based on matters of post-award contract administration may not be resolved in the context of a bid protest
  • rejecting protest standing in a breach of contract case that plaintiff alleged fell under this Court’s jurisdiction because it was “in connection with a procurement”
  • “Before filing suit in this court under the CDA, a plaintiff must first submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a final decision.” (citing 41 U.S.C. § 7103(a))
  • “The CDA exclusively governs Government contracts and Government contract disputes.”
  • “[T]o the extent that this court would have jurisdiction to hear any of plaintiffs claims alleging a breach of [a] contract — or any claim related to the administration or management of [a] contract — such a claim must be brought under the CDA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Turner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.