· 5/15/1878
Smithee v. Garth
Citations
- 33 Ark. 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a contract awardee lacks standing to bring a bid protest in connection to its own contract unless the contract awardee challenges corrective action on the same contract
- noting that disputes between a current contractor and the government that are based on matters of post-award contract administration may not be resolved in the context of a bid protest
- rejecting protest standing in a breach of contract case that plaintiff alleged fell under this Court’s jurisdiction because it was “in connection with a procurement”
- “Before filing suit in this court under the CDA, a plaintiff must first submit a written claim to the contracting officer for a final decision.” (citing 41 U.S.C. § 7103(a))
- “The CDA exclusively governs Government contracts and Government contract disputes.”
- “[T]o the extent that this court would have jurisdiction to hear any of plaintiffs claims alleging a breach of [a] contract — or any claim related to the administration or management of [a] contract — such a claim must be brought under the CDA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Turner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.