Skip to main content
· 10/29/2007

Smith & Wesson Corp. v. City of Gary

Citations

  • 875 N.E.2d 422
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2381
  • 2007 WL 3132846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the City’s complaint alleged illegal and unlawful conduct/sales by Defendants and the knowing violation of Indiana statutes – both the public nuisance statute and regulatory statutes – applicable to the sale or marketing of firearms
  • “Based on the language of the predicate exception, the specific context of the predicate exception, and the broader context of the PLCAA, we conclude that the predicate exception is unambiguous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Riley, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.