Smith v. Winthrop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “invention” as used in 35 U.S.C. § 120 (Supp. IV 1986), refers to what is claimed
• “[A]ppellant is asking [the court] to make the decision that various bits of his claimed invention are supported in the parent applications____ The majority opinion properly rejects this approach.”
• explaining a similar contrast between section 120 and Rule 131
• construing the section 112, 111 requirements of section 120

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).