Skip to main content
· 6/30/1993

Smith v. Whitener

Citations

  • 856 S.W.2d 328
  • 42 Ark. App. 225
  • 1993 Ark. App. LEXIS 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that although enrichment to the defendant must be at the expense of the plaintiff, the enrichment need not come directly from the plaintiff, but rather may come from a third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pittman, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.