· 2/19/1964
Smith v. WGN, INC.
Citations
- 197 N.E.2d 482
- 47 Ill. App. 2d 183
- 1964 Ill. App. LEXIS 656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he use of plaintiff’s pictures for advertising purposes, if without his consent, constitutes an invasion of his right of privacy and may entitle him to recover more than nominal damages”
- “[t]he use of plaintiff’s pictures for advertising purposes, if without his consent, constitutes an invasion of his right of privacy and may entitle him to recover more than nominal damages”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friend, Burke, Bryant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.