Skip to main content
· 2/19/1964

Smith v. WGN, INC.

Citations

  • 197 N.E.2d 482
  • 47 Ill. App. 2d 183
  • 1964 Ill. App. LEXIS 656

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]he use of plaintiff’s pictures for advertising purposes, if without his consent, constitutes an invasion of his right of privacy and may entitle him to recover more than nominal damages”
  • “[t]he use of plaintiff’s pictures for advertising purposes, if without his consent, constitutes an invasion of his right of privacy and may entitle him to recover more than nominal damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friend, Burke, Bryant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.