Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 6/14/2000

Smith v. West

Citations

  • 13 Vet. App. 525
  • 2000 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 519
  • 2000 WL 764407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that misleading advice from a veterans service organization does not warrant equitable tolling
  • holding that the assertion that language in a Board Chairman’s denial of motion for Board reconsideration was confusing and misleading was insufficient, by itself or taken together with the notice of appellate rights, to trigger the application of the doctrine of equitable tolling
  • holding that the assertion that language in a Board Chairman's denial of motion for Board reconsideration was confusing and misleading was insufficient, by itself or taken together with the notice of appellate rights, to trigger the application of the doctrine of equitable tolling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ivers, Steinberg, Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.