· 1/24/1984
Smith v. Weinstein
Citations
- 578 F. Supp. 1297
- 222 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 381
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “No character infringement claim can succeed unless plaintiffs original conception sufficiently developed the character, and defendants have copied this development and not merely the broader outlines.”
- “To the extent plaintiff rests his contract claim not on breach of the terms of the contract but on Weinstein’s having copied his property, the KKK script, in making ‘Stir Crazy,’ it is of course preempted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sofaer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.