Smith v. Weaver
Citations
- 41 Pa. Super. 253
- 1909 Pa. Super. LEXIS 44
Syllabus
<p>Contract — Bond—Sufficiency of bond.</p> <p>1. Where one party agrees to deliver to another party a bond satisfactory to the latter for the performance of the contract, the expression of dissatisfaction by the latter with the bond tendered, is sufficient without more to excuse the latter from the performance of the condition of his contract, if there is no evidence that the rejection of the bond was due to an unreasonable or capricious motive.</p> <p>2. The sufficiency of the bond tendered in such a case cannot be shown by the mere ex parte affidavit of the surety of the bond.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Head, Henderson, Morrison, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Perry v. SpellmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-03-22· cited 6×
- LAMAR COUNTY ELEC. CO-OP. ASS'N v. RisingerTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-06-26· cited 2×
- Lamar County Electric Cooperative Ass'n v. RisingerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-06-26· cited 1×
- Perry v. SpellmanChester County Court of Common Pleas· 1960-06-06
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1885-10-05· cited 65×
- Nelson v. Von BonnhorstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1857-07-01· cited 14×
- Howard v. SmedleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1891-02-16· cited 8×
- Delahunty Dyeing Machine Co. v. Pennsylvania Knitting MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-03-14· cited 4×
- Lippincott's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-10-13· cited 3×
- Carbon Spring Water Ice Co. v. HawkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-10-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.