District of Columbia· 8/23/2013
Smith v. Washington Post Company
Citations
- 962 F. Supp. 2d 79
- 2013 WL 4495132
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120012
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “there is no requirement that a plaintiff attach a copy of the underlying contract to his complaint”
- “[A] motion to strike is a disfavored, drastic remedy[.] Courts rarely grant motions to dismiss or strike class allegations before there is a chance for discovery.”
- declaratory judgment action appropriately seeking guidance regarding existence of binding implied contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Royce C. Lamberth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Badwal v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-28· cited 60×
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldD.C. Circuit· 2017-10-25· cited 22×
- Alvarez v. Keystone Plus Construction CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-11· cited 18×
- In Re: McCormick & Company, Inc., Pepper Products Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-11· cited 15×
- Friends Christian High School v. Geneva Financial Consultants, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2014-04-24· cited 10×
- Bradford v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-04-18· cited 10×
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-29· cited 6×
- Bradley Patton v. Mike FitzhughSixth Circuit· 2025-03-13· cited 6×
- Lannan Foundation v. GingoldDistrict of Columbia· 2017-10-25
- Ross v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District of Columbia· 2020-07-21
- Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2023-07-21
- Pride v. U.S. Department of AgricultureDistrict of Columbia· 2024-08-23
- Iyer v. George Washington University School of Medicine and Health SciencesDistrict of Columbia· 2025-08-01
- Fisher v. YellenDistrict of Columbia· 2025-09-30
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Atherton v. District of Columbia Office of the MayorD.C. Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 985×
- Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 655×
- Harris v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Veterans AffairsD.C. Circuit· 1997-10-10· cited 165×
- Dearth v. HolderD.C. Circuit· 2011-04-15· cited 144×
- News World Communications, Inc. v. ThompsenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-07-14· cited 118×
- In Re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust LitigationD.C. Circuit· 2013-08-09· cited 110×
- Gray v. First Winthrop Corp.N.D. California· 1990-10-25· cited 105×
- In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationN.D. California· 2007-05-29· cited 95×
- Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 2012-11-02· cited 70×
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-28· cited 65×
- Spicer v. Pier Sixty LLCS.D. New York· 2010-07-27· cited 53×
- English-Speaking Un v. Johnson, JamesD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-16· cited 47×
- Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia· 1983-10-06· cited 38×
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict of Columbia· 2004-09-30· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.