Smith v. Village of Maywood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Monopolization cases involving such regulated industries are special in nature and require close scrutiny\
• no antitrust injury because the “mere substitution” of an electricity reseller for the electric company selling directly to consumers did not affect competition
• “Monopolization cases involving such regulated industries are special in nature and require close scrutiny”
• “Monopolization cases involving such regulated industries are special in nature and require close scrutiny.”
• the antitrust laws were intended to protect competition, not necessarily competitors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).