Skip to main content
· 9/30/1980

Smith v. University of North Carolina

Citations

  • 632 F.2d 316
  • 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • nature of the dispute strongly suggested that Legislature intended amendment to apply to situation at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Murnaghan, Widener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.