Smith v. University of Alaska, Fairbanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that findings related to weight are within province of fact-finder, which is Board in workers' compensation cases
• requiring Board to evaluate lay testimony that \could undermine\ employer's doctor's analysis of the course of the employee's illness
• reversing Board’s decision not to consider lay testimony in medically complex back-injury case
• \Substantial evidence is 'such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.' \ (quoting Circle De Lumber Co. v. Humphrey, 130 P.3d 941, 946 (Alaska 2006))
• “Substantial evidence is ‘such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” (quoting Circle De Lumber Co. v. Humphrey, 130 P.3d 941, 946 (Alaska 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).