Smith v. United States Internal Revenue Service (In Re Smith)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts “will not re-weigh the evidence or “substitute our judgment for the Commissioner’s”
• noting that “in the event of evidentiary conflict or uncertainty,” we will not “substitute our judgment for the Commissioner’s, even if we believe the evidence weighs against the Commissioner’s decision” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “We will not re-weigh the evidence . . . [or] substitute our judgment for the Commissioner’s . . . .”
• “We will not re-weigh the evidence nor, in the event of evidentiary conflict or uncertainty, will we substitute our judgment for the Commissioner’s, even if we believe the evidence weighs against the Commissioner’s decision.” (cleaned up)
• “Any error at step two would likewise be harmless, given that the ALJ concluded at step four, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Garcia retained the ability to perform his past relevant work as a produce broker.”
• “Any error at step two would likewise be harmless, given that the ALJ concluded at step four, on the basis of substantial evidence, that Garcia retained the ability to perform his past relevant work as a produce broker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).