Smith v. United States Customs & Border Protection

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “jurisdiction-stripping” provisions of MENDOZA-LINARES V. GARLAND 23 § 242(e) do not permit a court to “evaluate the merits” of the determinations underlying an expedited removal order
• refusing to consider claim that \rest[ed] on facts and documents that were never before the district court\
• refusing to consider claim that \rest[ed] on facts and documents that were never before the district court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).